Pogled javnosti o prihvatanju geotermalnih sistema
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Objavljeno
Feb 1, 2025
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Aleksandar Petrovski
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-1510
Aleksandar Anđelković
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-6793
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-1510
Aleksandar Anđelković
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-6793
Apstrakt
Gеоtеrmalni sistеmi nеmaјu isti nivо prihvaćеnоsti оd stranе јavnоsti u pоrеđеnju sa sоlarnim ili vеtrоtеhničkim tеhnоlоgiјama. Cilј оvоg rada је da ispita stavоvе јavnоsti i društvеnе stavоvе о kоrišćеnju gеоtеrmalnе еnеrgiје. Оvaј rad idеntifikuје različitе društvеnе bariјеrе i katеgоrišÐµ ih u glavnе grupе, kaо štо su еkоlоška, еkоnоmska, društvеna, pоlitička i katеgоriјa upravlјanja prојеktima. Nadalје, nalazi pоkazuјu da је za pоstizanjе društvеnоg prihvatanja nеоphоdan inkluzivan, transparеntan i participativan prоcеs izmеđu svih zaintеrеsоvanih strana. Оva studiјa ima za cilј da uspоstavi оkvir zasnоvan na upravlјanju prојеktima kојi mоžÐµ pоvеćati prihvatanjе gеоtеrmalnih sistеma оd stranе оpštе јavnоsti.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Kako citirati
PETROVSKI, Aleksandar; ANĐELKOVIĆ, Aleksandar.
Pogled javnosti o prihvatanju geotermalnih sistema.
Zbornik Međunarodnog kongresa i izložbe o KGH, [S.l.], v. 55, n. 1, p. 175-180, feb. 2025.
Dostupno na: <http://www.izdanja.smeits.rs/index.php/kghk/article/view/8147>. Datum pristupa: 10 mar. 2026
doi: https://doi.org/10.24094/kghk.024.1.175.
Sekcija
Obnovljivi izvori energije
Reference
[1] Karytsas, S., O. Polyzou, D. Mendrinos, C. Karytsas, Towards social acceptance of geother-mal energy power plants, Den Haag, Netherlands: 2019.
[2] de Jesus, A. C., Socio-economic impacts of geothermal development. Proc. World Geotherm. Congr., Florence, Italy: PreCongress Course on Environmental Aspects of Geothermal Devel-opment. IGA / CNRInternational School of Geothermics; 1995.
[3] Popovski, K., Political and public acceptance of geothermal energy. Geotherm. Train. Pro-gramme, ReykjavÃk, Iceland: The United Nations University; 2003.
[4] Wüstenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, M. J. Bürer, Social acceptance of renewable energy innova-tion: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007; 35: 2683 – 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.
[5] Walker, G., N. Cass, Carbon reduction, – ˜the public – ™ and renewable energy: engaging with so-cio-technical configurations. Area 2007;39:458 – 69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x.
[6] Farghali, M., A. I. Osman, Z. Chen, Abdelhaleem A, Ihara I, Mohamed IMA, et al. Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review. Environ Chem Lett 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1.
[7] Kelly, G., History and potential of renewable energy development in New Zealand. Renew Sus-tain Energy Rev 2011;15:2501 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.021.
[8] Kubota, H., H. Hondo, S. Hienuki, H. Kaieda, Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs. Energy Policy 2013;61:1079 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.084.
[9] Soltani, M., F. Moradi Kashkooli, M. Souri, B. Rafiei, M. Jabarifar, K. Gharali, et al., En-vironmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;140:110750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750.
[10] Yasukawa, K., H. Kubota, N. Soma, T. Noda, Integration of natural and social environment in the implementation of geothermal projects. Geothermics 2018;73:111 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.09.011.
[11] Barbier, E., Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview. Renew Sustain En-ergy Rev 2002;6:3 – 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00002-3.
[12] Codrea, V., R. Călburean, Geothermal Energy in Western Apuseni Mountains (Romania) for Economic and Sustainable Purposes, Antalya, Turkey: 2013.
[13] Cataldi, R., Social acceptance of geothermal projects: problems and costs. EC Int. Geotherm. Course, Oradea, Romania: 2001.
[14] Dowd, A-M., N. Boughen, P. Ashworth, S. Carr-Cornish, Geothermal technology in Aus-tralia: Investigating social acceptance. Energy Policy 2011;39:6301 – 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.029.
[15] Pasqualetti, M. J., Social Barriers to Renewable Energy Landscapes. Geogr Rev 2011;101:201 – 23.
[16] Peterson, T. R., J. C. Stephens, E. J. Wilson, Public perception of and engagement with emerging low-carbon energy technologies: A literature review. MRS Energy Sustain 2015;2:E11. https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2015.12.
[17] Zamfir, A., S. E. Colesca, R-A. Corbos, Public policies to support the development of renew-able energy in Romania: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;58:87 – 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.235.
[18] Vargas Payera, S., Understanding social acceptance of geothermal energy: Case study for Ar-aucanÃa region, Chile. Geothermics 2018;72:138 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.10.014.
[19] [19] *** International Standardization Organization. ISO 21500 Project, programme and portfo-lio management – ” Context and concepts 2021.
[20] [20] *** Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 2013.
[21] Carr-Cornish, S., L. Romanach, Differences in Public Perceptions of Geothermal Energy Technology in Australia. Energies 2014;7:1555 – 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7031555.
[22] Salter, H., Toward a Critical Rhetoric of Risk Communication: Producing Citizens and the Role of Technical Communicators. Tech Commun 1999;46:272 – 272.
[23] Baek, H., J-B. Chung, G. W. Yun, Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2021;172:121027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121027.
[24] Kim, J-H., H-H. Kim, S-H. Yoo, Social acceptance toward constructing a combined heat and power plant near people – ™s dwellings in South Korea. Energy 2022;244:123175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123175.
[25] *** GeoEnergy T. Four areas for potential geothermal power generation discovered in Romania | ThinkGeoEnergy - Geothermal Energy News 2020. https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/four-areas-for-potential-geothermal-power-generation-discovered-in-romania/ (accessed April 18, 2023).
[26] Balgaranov, D., Romanian town starts geothermal project for district heating | TheMayor.EU 2023. https://www.themayor.eu/en/a/view/romanian-town-starts-geothermal-project-for-district-heating-11665 (accessed April 18, 2023).
[27] Todorović, I., Romania is exploring geothermal waters at 24 locations. Balk Green Energy News 2023. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/romania-is-exploring-geothermal-waters-at-24-locations/ (accessed April 18, 2023).
[28] Nádor, A., Danube Region Geothermal Repor. Geological and Geophysical Institute of Hunga-ry; 2014.
[2] de Jesus, A. C., Socio-economic impacts of geothermal development. Proc. World Geotherm. Congr., Florence, Italy: PreCongress Course on Environmental Aspects of Geothermal Devel-opment. IGA / CNRInternational School of Geothermics; 1995.
[3] Popovski, K., Political and public acceptance of geothermal energy. Geotherm. Train. Pro-gramme, ReykjavÃk, Iceland: The United Nations University; 2003.
[4] Wüstenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, M. J. Bürer, Social acceptance of renewable energy innova-tion: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007; 35: 2683 – 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.
[5] Walker, G., N. Cass, Carbon reduction, – ˜the public – ™ and renewable energy: engaging with so-cio-technical configurations. Area 2007;39:458 – 69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x.
[6] Farghali, M., A. I. Osman, Z. Chen, Abdelhaleem A, Ihara I, Mohamed IMA, et al. Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review. Environ Chem Lett 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1.
[7] Kelly, G., History and potential of renewable energy development in New Zealand. Renew Sus-tain Energy Rev 2011;15:2501 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.021.
[8] Kubota, H., H. Hondo, S. Hienuki, H. Kaieda, Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs. Energy Policy 2013;61:1079 – 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.084.
[9] Soltani, M., F. Moradi Kashkooli, M. Souri, B. Rafiei, M. Jabarifar, K. Gharali, et al., En-vironmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;140:110750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750.
[10] Yasukawa, K., H. Kubota, N. Soma, T. Noda, Integration of natural and social environment in the implementation of geothermal projects. Geothermics 2018;73:111 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.09.011.
[11] Barbier, E., Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview. Renew Sustain En-ergy Rev 2002;6:3 – 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00002-3.
[12] Codrea, V., R. Călburean, Geothermal Energy in Western Apuseni Mountains (Romania) for Economic and Sustainable Purposes, Antalya, Turkey: 2013.
[13] Cataldi, R., Social acceptance of geothermal projects: problems and costs. EC Int. Geotherm. Course, Oradea, Romania: 2001.
[14] Dowd, A-M., N. Boughen, P. Ashworth, S. Carr-Cornish, Geothermal technology in Aus-tralia: Investigating social acceptance. Energy Policy 2011;39:6301 – 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.029.
[15] Pasqualetti, M. J., Social Barriers to Renewable Energy Landscapes. Geogr Rev 2011;101:201 – 23.
[16] Peterson, T. R., J. C. Stephens, E. J. Wilson, Public perception of and engagement with emerging low-carbon energy technologies: A literature review. MRS Energy Sustain 2015;2:E11. https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2015.12.
[17] Zamfir, A., S. E. Colesca, R-A. Corbos, Public policies to support the development of renew-able energy in Romania: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;58:87 – 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.235.
[18] Vargas Payera, S., Understanding social acceptance of geothermal energy: Case study for Ar-aucanÃa region, Chile. Geothermics 2018;72:138 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.10.014.
[19] [19] *** International Standardization Organization. ISO 21500 Project, programme and portfo-lio management – ” Context and concepts 2021.
[20] [20] *** Project Management Institute. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 2013.
[21] Carr-Cornish, S., L. Romanach, Differences in Public Perceptions of Geothermal Energy Technology in Australia. Energies 2014;7:1555 – 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7031555.
[22] Salter, H., Toward a Critical Rhetoric of Risk Communication: Producing Citizens and the Role of Technical Communicators. Tech Commun 1999;46:272 – 272.
[23] Baek, H., J-B. Chung, G. W. Yun, Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2021;172:121027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121027.
[24] Kim, J-H., H-H. Kim, S-H. Yoo, Social acceptance toward constructing a combined heat and power plant near people – ™s dwellings in South Korea. Energy 2022;244:123175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123175.
[25] *** GeoEnergy T. Four areas for potential geothermal power generation discovered in Romania | ThinkGeoEnergy - Geothermal Energy News 2020. https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/four-areas-for-potential-geothermal-power-generation-discovered-in-romania/ (accessed April 18, 2023).
[26] Balgaranov, D., Romanian town starts geothermal project for district heating | TheMayor.EU 2023. https://www.themayor.eu/en/a/view/romanian-town-starts-geothermal-project-for-district-heating-11665 (accessed April 18, 2023).
[27] Todorović, I., Romania is exploring geothermal waters at 24 locations. Balk Green Energy News 2023. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/romania-is-exploring-geothermal-waters-at-24-locations/ (accessed April 18, 2023).
[28] Nádor, A., Danube Region Geothermal Repor. Geological and Geophysical Institute of Hunga-ry; 2014.